Google Reviews
Illinois State Bar Association
Illinois Trial Lawyers Association
American Association for Justice
Avvo Rating Top Attorney Immigration
The National Trial Lawyers
American Immigration Lawyers Association

EB-1B Outstanding Professors and Researchers

Navigating the EB-1 visa pathway for outstanding professors and researchers can be complex and nuanced. This pathway, under the First Preference EB-1 category, is reserved for individuals internationally recognized as outstanding in specific academic fields. The major advantage of this category is the exemption from the labor-intensive labor certification process required for other visa categories, facilitating a somewhat more streamlined process for eligible individuals.

Overview of the EB-1 Visa for Outstanding Professors and Researchers

Zneimer & Zneimer PC excels in assisting internationally recognized professors and researchers in obtaining U.S. permanent residency through the EB-1B visa pathway. This premier category is specifically designed for those who have distinguished themselves as leaders in their academic fields.

Statutory and Regulatory Framework

The Immigration Act of 1990 significantly expanded the United States visa system, including the establishment of the EB-1 visa category under 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(1). This category is reserved for "priority workers," which include outstanding professors and researchers recognized internationally in their specific academic fields. Notably, this visa classification does not require the labor-intensive labor certification process that other visa categories demand, streamlining the application process for qualified individuals.

Criteria for Recognition as an Outstanding Professor or Researcher

To qualify under this prestigious category, applicants must demonstrate:

  1. International Recognition: As defined by 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(1)(B), applicants must be internationally recognized as outstanding in a specific academic area.
  2. Experience Requirement: Applicants must have at least three years of experience in teaching or research in that academic area.
  3. Future Employment: Applicants must be entering the U.S. to pursue tenure, tenure-track teaching, or a comparable research position at a higher education institution or a comparable research position at a university or higher education institution. A research position with a private employer, provided that the employer has at least three full-time researchers and has achieved documented accomplishments in the academic field.
Documenting Your Achievements

In line with the regulations outlined in 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(i), applicants must provide evidence of their international recognition, which could include:

  1. Major awards or prizes for outstanding achievement.
  2. Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement.
  3. Publications in significant journals about the applicant's work.
  4. Participation as a judge of others' work in the field.
  5. Original and significant contributions to the field.
  6. Authorship of scholarly articles or books in internationally circulated journals and presses.
Kazarian Two-Step Analysis

USCIS employs the "Kazarian two-step analysis" to evaluate EB-1 applications. Initially, the evidence must meet specific regulatory criteria to move to a final merits determination, which assesses whether the totality of the evidence demonstrates the applicant's outstanding qualifications in context of their field.


There are several pitfalls and challenges that applicants and their legal representatives need to navigate:

  1. Proving International Recognition: The most significant challenge is substantiating the claim of international recognition in a specific academic area. Applicants must provide compelling evidence such as major awards, significant memberships, and influential publications. However, merely meeting the minimum evidence requirements (such as having publications or being a member of academic associations) may not suffice. The USCIS often looks for more substantial recognition or renown, setting a high bar for what constitutes "outstanding."
  2. Quality Over Quantity in Publications: For researchers and professors, the quality of publications can be more critical than the quantity. High-impact publications, significant citations, and leading author positions are scrutinized to assess the influence and standing of the applicant in the academic community. A large number of publications without significant recognition or impact may not convincingly demonstrate outstanding status.
  3. Kazarian Two-Step Analysis: This analysis first checks if the regulatory criteria have been met and then assesses the totality of the evidence to determine if it indeed supports the claim of being internationally recognized as outstanding. This two-step process can be a hurdle if the evidence does not holistically convey the applicant's prominence in their field.
  4. Documentation and Evidence of Ongoing Employment: Applicants must also demonstrate that they are entering the U.S. to pursue a tenure or similar research position at a recognized institution, which sometimes requires detailed job offers and evidence of the institution’s ability to support such a role.
  5. Legal and Procedural Nuances: Misinterpretations of the regulatory and statutory requirements can lead to denials. For instance, misunderstanding the nature of the evidence required under the six regulatory criteria can weaken an application.
Zneimer & Zneimer PC Can Provide Invaluable Assistance by:
  • Crafting a compelling narrative that highlights an applicant's achievements and international stature.
  • Ensuring that the evidence presented meets both the letter and the spirit of the USCIS requirements.
  • Navigating complex legal arguments and responding effectively to Requests for Evidence (RFE) or potential denials based on the Kazarian analysis.

While the EB-1 visa category offers a valuable pathway for outstanding professors and researchers to gain U.S. permanent residency, it requires careful legal and strategic planning to overcome the inherent challenges of the application process. With the expertise of Zneimer & Zneimer PC, applicants are better positioned to demonstrate their qualifications comprehensively and effectively.

Client Reviews
Someone rear-ended my car last spring and I was injured. Peter and Sofia Zneimer and they staff were professional and were always available by phone. I knew that the insurance of the other driver wasn't very good but they were still able to settle my case promptly and I was satisfied with the money I received. Overall, a very good trusted experience. Natig M.
I highly recommend the services of Zneimer and Zneimer. I often seek legal advice from them related to my immigration status and way forward. Both Sofia and Peter are very detailed and quick in answering any question. I laud their professionalism and a very efficient team that works for them. Suman S.
I totally recommend Sofia, she is the best lawyer in Chicago area. She is very professional, very detailed with her work and supportive. She always goes above and beyond to ensure the best outcome. Caring, compassionate and only the best for your family. I won my case because of her professionalism and her knowledge of the law. Aurel P.
I have dealt with Sofia Zneimer since 2009. She is a great lawyer and has helped me tremendously in navigating the process of green card. She is a great resource to have by your side. She is easy to reach. She responds very quickly, which was very important for me. If she can’t answer the question the same day, she does let you know that she is working on it. I would have no hesitation in recruiting her. Hemant S.
I called Zneimer & Zneimer after I was rear-ended on the highway. Peter and Sofia Zneimer have been very helpful in dealing with the insurance company and getting money for my car damage. They are also handling my injury case. They answer all my questions and I am always able to reach them on the phone anytime I want to talk to them. I am confident in having them represent me. The best choice i ever made. Thank you! Emil G.